|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
I have an idea for a personalized weapon for a character; a gauntlet with chainsaw links along the front knuckles and along the back for punching and back-handing and the same arrangement on the front of the hand for slaps or grapples.
Now, if I grapple, how much damage would a chainsaw do CLENCHED on something,. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: One Mile Up
|
Quote:
If you're talking about a glove somehow covered in moving chainsaw blades, then reality has gone right out the window and you may as well make it do whatever damage you want. Regular chainsaw damage sounds about right to me - multiple blades make up for the shorter length and distributed area of surface contact, sort of, if you squint a little... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: One Mile Up
|
That's pretty much exactly not what I opined, but when you're talking about something this silly the only real limit is what your players are willing to suspend disbelief on. If you think they'd swallow that rationale, go for it. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denmark
|
Quote:
Multiple points of contact destribute the damage over a larger area, meaning actually less damage. Thats why GURPS give a damage difference between a rounded mace and a normal war-mace. I would rule it count as knuckedusters +1 punch dam... no matter if you got one ridge or 5 or 100. --- Hopwever if your talking about some sci-fi weapon with moving chainlinks on your hand I would rule it doing 1d6 dam per sec of contact.
__________________
There is no RAW, the RAW is a lie. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
[1] In the kind of world where chain saw gauntlets make sense in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Alright, lemme clarify a few things;
Yeah it's a glove where there's a chainsaw link basically everywhere. And these links spin, per a chainsaw. Now. Chainsaws do the damage they do because they motor around while cutting. So if I have essentially five chainsaws, I'm doing five chainsaws of damage, one per finger, was what I was saying. Is there a problem with that logic. And if I'm clenching these chainsaws around someone (like fingers, on a glove, a glove full of chainsaws), like around their wrist, how would this modify the strength component of the chainsaw, since the chainsaw is now enclosed around the person's wrist? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denmark
|
You mean aside from physics and simple normal human logic? No. I get the picture perfectly, it's just not, in any way a logical weapon that is in any way availeble with technology of today (not without drastic drawbacks). But no reason to let that stop you :)
Quote:
A normal Chainsaw does 1d extra thanks to the rotating links, so 5 should deal 5d. The clenching doesn't deal any more damage than normal, as you need to press the chainsaw hard against something for it to deal damage in the first place. So realyl clenchign it hard would indeed be the only way to deal damage with it. So 5d per dec you are clenching someones wrist. A wrist is able to take over 1xHP before it's chopped off. So grasping someones wrist would cut it off in 1 sec for most people.
__________________
There is no RAW, the RAW is a lie. Last edited by Maz; 10-29-2009 at 02:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|