View Single Post
Old 09-05-2017, 03:44 PM   #7
warellis
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Default Re: Statting 5.56x45mm ball; M855A1

M855A1 ballistic gel test: https://youtu.be/d8IvDPuVuho

M80A1 ballistic gel test: https://youtu.be/yW-jlvNQA8w

In real life, the M855A1 ball ammo is superior to M855 ball ammo due to much quicker, and more consistent, fragmentation when coming out of either 14.5-inch barrels, like those of the M4A1, or out of 20-inch barrels, like those of the M16A4.

It is less velocity dependent compared to the original M855 ball ammo.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2...the-real-deal/
Quote:
TWC Tests M855A1: Yes, It’s The Real Deal

M855A1 is the Army’s new round; it boasts improved accuracy, penetration, and terminal effectiveness vs. the legacy M855 “green tip” round. We previously covered the story of M855A1, and Major Glenn Dean’s history of the round’s development, but how does it really perform? Fortunately, The Wound Channel has come into possession of some of the new ammunition, and put it to the test.

https://youtu.be/d8IvDPuVuho

If the above gel tests are representative, then the Army’s research and development has paid off. The round exhibited exceptionally short time to fragmentation, and deep penetration from the stable copper slug, with an added deviating wound channel from the steel “arrowhead” penetrating tip. That is certainly improved performance vs. M855, but unfortunately with only two shots into gel, the above video does not give us an idea of how true the Army’s claims that the M855A1 EPR is yaw independent are – though the very short neck before the breakup of the projectile does suggest it is fragmenting before any yaw is occurring.

As for penetration, The Wound Channel tested M855A1 against AR600 and AR680 steel plates, with the Enhanced Performance Round defeating both handily, even though they are both rated to stop the “semi armor penetrating” M855; the latter video is embedded below:

https://youtu.be/tMSNc3lZsYE

M855A1 has not been without its detractors, nor has it been free of its fair share of teething troubles, including issues with increased wear and tear on the rifles firing it, but it certainly seems to be a big step up in performance from legacy ammunition.

Last edited by warellis; 09-05-2017 at 04:01 PM.
warellis is offline   Reply With Quote