Steve Jackson Games Forums - View Single Post

~~Peter Knutsen~~ · 01-18-2009, 05:05 AM

Titans have the same classes as Giants, and cost the same to raise and maintain, but they have much better TS. Is this deliberate? I can't see the logic.

Secondly, why is there no infantry that is equivalent to Horse Archers? Okay, I realize that the equivalent shouldn't get the Cavalry class, but why are there no infantry units (at low TL anyway) that combines Fire and Recon, the same way Horse Archers do? I want to make cool ninja units, much cooler than the one in the book, but I don't want to have to make them mounted (even though the Cavalry role is nice on top of everything else).

01-18-2009, 05:05 AM	#1
~~Peter Knutsen~~ Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Europe	Mass Combat: What's up with Titans? Titans have the same classes as Giants, and cost the same to raise and maintain, but they have much better TS. Is this deliberate? I can't see the logic. Secondly, why is there no infantry that is equivalent to Horse Archers? Okay, I realize that the equivalent shouldn't get the Cavalry class, but why are there no infantry units (at low TL anyway) that combines Fire and Recon, the same way Horse Archers do? I want to make cool ninja units, much cooler than the one in the book, but I don't want to have to make them mounted (even though the Cavalry role is nice on top of everything else).