Quote:
Originally Posted by Plane
You mean instead of, or in addition to?
In addition would seem to favor Feints over Deceptive Attacks. If resisting a QC counts as a defence for purposes of Feints then why not DA?
|
Because you use a DA to force a penalty on an opponent's defence. This doesn't work as well for a disarm. A disarm requires a successful hit on the weapon, plus a QC.
I suppose that the defenders penalty from the DA could be used as a penalty to the defender for the QC instead of their normal defence.
__________________
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
Warning: Invertebrate Punnster - Spinelessly Unable to Resist a Pun
Dangerous Thoughts, my blog about GURPS and life.