View Single Post
Old 04-15-2012, 11:15 AM   #28
Ulzgoroth
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default Re: Why short bow instead of long bow?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EtVous View Post
How about the fact that the nobles did not like the fact that anyone could damage their precious/expensive to maintain and train knights.
Longbows are not anti-tank weapons. They're not harmless to armored knights but they're not that big a threat.

Also, if you're banning anti-knight weapons you'd need to start with spears.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EtVous View Post
The long bow was a late comer and required a lot of training, this means expenses, poor people need to work for a living, not spend their time training for an edge they did not need.
All bows required a lot of training. And longbows are in no wise a late-arriving technology.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident.
Ulzgoroth is offline   Reply With Quote