Quote:
Originally Posted by MunchkinMan
Well, your agreement was for him to get first pick of one Treasure, and you would get the rest, so you'd get one, he'd get one.
|
Hello MunchkinMan, thanks for taking the time to reply.
I am the other person that was part of this situation (with Msaylor92). Msaylor92's argument – still – is that he agreed to help so long as he got two treasure, no matter what they were. My side of the deal was that I get one treasure of my choosing (he now understands that since my side of the deal was choosing a card of my choice, that particular situation was in my favor). Our debate is whose side of the deal takes priority when fewer treasures are on the table due to modifiers. Could you shed any light on that?