Quote:
Originally Posted by Otaku
I didn't even think an example was necessary (though it is appreciated); it shouldn't be any great stretch of the imagination that those with power would find ways for the rules to apply to everyone else. Only a hopeful stretch that some would resist the tyranny as best as they could.
|
But that's not what the case is. It specifies that people with pistols are not okay
even if they are in a private army. Or if you're referring back to Malloyd's prior version, the private armies were using bows because the rules
did apply to them, they just didn't forbid them from being an army. There's nothing there about the rules not applying to people in power either way.
Having somebody enforcing weapon restrictions while not holding any sort of monopoly of force position is pretty weird. I wonder how that works.