Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno
I'd call the above two Accessibilities instead of Nuisance Effects, personally. I distinguish based on Accessibility being about conditions for activation that aren't covered by Trigger (Consumables) or Costs FP (another kind of consumable).
|
Yeah, there's a strong case to be made there.
Yep, for DR. It was for a racial power set involving force fields, telekinetic hammers, and telekinetic blades. They fought each other by hammering each other into the exhaustion on the shields. Old set of images I got when i was 14 or something. One of the first things I tried to model in gurps.
Though there is a version of it where the effect is applied to the parry of the melee attack.
Quote:
I'd generally call these Triggers - but Trigger comes with a Duration cap baked in that you don't necessarily need with an Accessibility. Depending on what's going on with the first (the cutting one), I might call that a combination of (Immediate) Preparation Required and whichever of Accessibility and Trigger - if there's a ritual, for example.
|
Yeah, the second one is a textbook trigger. I'd completely forgotten about that.
The one about using your own blood I considered a nuisance effect because he had a limited amount of it, it hurt, and it was creepy. I thought about using costs HP, but that just didn't work the way I wanted it to. the limitation was that he had a limited amount of his own blood and had to expose himself to all sorts of infection and so forth to use his abilities.
Quote:
Nuisance Effect, Accessibility, Trigger, and Temporary Disadvantage are sort of the Bucket limitations - you can get a lot done with them because they're big buckets of effects. Because they're broad, some peoples interpretations as to which bucket a given limitation goes in will obviously differ.
|
True enough.