Quote:
Originally Posted by tantric
I really hate digging through books when making characters. Invariably while working with GCA I see some odd trait that I might want, then have to go find some random PDF to find the details. It would be AMAZING to have the full trait description in the datafile. I would happily pay for such a data file.
I've been tinkering with Perl to try to create some automated way of reaching in the PDF and grabbing the text and adding it to the datafile, but the whole thing is a hot mess.
Even better, generate an HTML character sheet where I can click on the trait and get the text details. It's not as if you could play the game without the books given this info....
Just thinking.
|
We have discussed opening a PDF to the correct page from within GCA. The two main issues are different reading programs and errata might change the page that should be referenced.
I think the different readers could be dealt with by a configuration file that would be updated by the user to put in some kind of formatted string that would take a PDF name and page number. Now people may rename their PDFs so they would need to add a lookup table to the configuration file that would allow them to link their new name to the old name. The directory structure of the PDFs would probably need to be in that table as well as some people may keep their PDFs in different folders. This would be difficult to the non-technical people.
The errata would just require updates. I do not know how much this would change. There would be some confusion on what version of the PDF you have.
As far as putting more text in the files, it would increase the size of them by a huge amount thus slowing GCA down. It would make working on the files harder. These files are built more on a voluntary basis and that would add quite a bit to the work load.
If you check this post,
http://forums.sjgames.com/showpost.p...&postcount=207. Kromm says that if there is a new version it would not be a new set of rules, just a new delivery system. I think what he means is that they are thinking about new ways to access the rules. This is not as simple as let’s just do this, as each idea has different ramifications that need to be evaluated.