Re: Snatcher for One
Thanks for everyone's comments. I've read them all and considered them, and I still believe there's an inconsistency in definitions and usage as I explained above. If I'm wrong, it certainly won't be the first time. But if I'm right, that won't be the first time either. So I'm going to write this up and submit it to the errata coordinator.
At the very least, if it's not clear to me, I imagine it's not clear to someone else.
|