View Single Post
Old 05-01-2018, 06:27 AM   #36
mlangsdorf
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Default Re: [Spaceships] Paying more for better system?

Quote:
Originally Posted by YankeeGamer View Post
As I'm looking at options, I see one very useful, and, IMVHO, important and realistic modification.

Each turret has a specific amount that you get back if you put, for example, only 3 tertiary guns in place. That's the weight of the weapon emplacement.

Well, even BIG ships will use small guns; the Iowa class battleships used the same 20 mm Oikerlons for point defense that destroyers did.

I think that a section could be equipped with MUCH smaller weapons than the size class of the ship supports in the rules, with the rest cargo, or reaction mass, or whatever. Thus, a SM +15 ship could still have LOTS of guns suitable as secondary guns on a SM +5 ship, creating a forrest of fire for shooting at fighters and missiles.
I gave an example here http://forums.sjgames.com/showpost.p...2&postcount=17 of a battleship, cruiser, and escort where the battleship uses a tertiary battery to mount the same guns that the escort mounts in 6 secondary batteries. You could extend that indefinitely, with each gun slot in a tertiary battery holding 3x or 10x of SM -1 or SM -2 ship's tertiary battery.
__________________
Read my GURPS blog: http://noschoolgrognard.blogspot.com
mlangsdorf is offline   Reply With Quote