[Varyon]

Wikipedia notes that Dyneema and similar are around 40% stronger than aramid fibers. That would be consistent with a comparison between Ballistic Polymer and Improved Kevlar in the article (which is actually a 33.3% improvement), and we see a similar absolute jump between Kevlar and Improved Kevlar (-0.02) as between Ballistic Polymer and Improved Ballistic Polymer (-0.02), so the last may be a theoretical "Hey, we were able to make Kevlar better, we could probably do something similar with Dyneema, right?" Note we aren't out of TL8 yet, so designating some not-available-yet tech as TL8 isn't inappropriate (notably, the FN SCAR was still being developed when High Tech came out, but still got the TL8 designation).

Note, of course, that Ballistic Polymer and Improved Ballistic Polymer are actually better than Kevlar and Improved Kevlar in more ways than just their listed WM and DR/in. Against damage other than pi and cut, the ballistic polymers use a smaller divisor for DR - Kevlar uses a divisor of 4, Improved Kevlar a divisor of 3, and both ballistic polymers use a divisor of 2.5. In other words, their "true" WM's are 0.4, 0.32, 0.15, and 0.1. Additionally, their prices per DR are so close there's little reason not to use the ballistic polymers if they're available - for DR 1 full suits, Kevlar is $170.80/$683.20 (first number for pi/cut), Improved Kevlar is $204.96/$614.88, Ballistic Polymer is $256.20/$640.50, and Improved Ballistic Polymer is $213.50/$533.75 (yes, Improved Ballistic Polymer is both lighter and cheaper than Ballistic Polymer).