View Single Post
Old 03-02-2017, 04:06 AM   #36
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: Parahumans: What types do you think the canon needs, what type would you like to

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
Again, this is why I said that the word 'pheromones' is an unfortunate choice that locks the setting in a very specific way of achieving a result.
No, it really isn't. If it works to a level that's measurable in game mechanics, it's a psychoactive chemical.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
There are also currently perfumes which are advertised as 'having pheromones'; obviously they are not classed as drugs
That's because they are generally held to be ineffective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
Now consider: as TL grows, perfume-makers learn how to expand the percentage of people by those scents.
And lawmakers learn to recognize perfume makers attempting to do that, and make it illegal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh View Post
Earlier, you talk of measurable effects. The whole invention of Memetics seems to be such a proof that talking can indeed circumvent, subvert, hack or otherwise modify a person's decisionmaking processes. It was MD that borrowed Memetics from THS and not the other way around, correct?
MD? In any case, plenty of societies have made particular types of memetics illegal, though usually under names such as 'sedition'.
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote