View Single Post
Old 10-12-2016, 01:04 PM   #19
Tomsdad
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
Default Re: High/Ultra-Tech Versions of Low-Tech Armor

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHoward View Post
It should also only cover the chest, not the entire torso.
Yep


Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent View Post
Really? Hmm. In that case it should come closer to the LT II calculations. I guess halve it for the front (9.45 lbs) and do the back separate...

DR 10 Front, DR 4 Back, $1323, 13.23 lbs.
If the front is DR10 and the back DR4 (and assuming back and front are same area), I'd take the total weight divide by 14 and multiply by 10 to get the front and multiply by 4 to get the back

8.57lbs for the front and 3.43lbs for the back

(edit: this is a simplification as even the back and front is the same in terms of the area being covered, the front plate is likely to be angled more than the back plate allowing for relative reduced weight for the same protection).

If you use the chest location/area and armour by material design rules to retroactively derive material values from the pyramid articles I mentioned, you end up with very, very good steel (WM = 0.40)

Last edited by Tomsdad; 10-14-2016 at 12:00 AM. Reason: Point about angled protection
Tomsdad is offline   Reply With Quote